Clinical Care Access to Care Quality of Care Search Policies & Programs

hints
Display All Policies & Programs

Consumer participation in health care governance

Health Factors: Quality of Care
Decision Makers: Healthcare Professionals & Advocates Public Health Professionals & Advocates
Evidence Rating: Expert Opinion
Population Reach: 50-99% of WI's population
Impact on Disparities: No impact on disparities likely

Is this program or policy in use in your community? Tell us about it.

Description

Health care entities are often governed by boards that are charged with setting the organization’s strategic direction; board decisions help determine organizational policy, shape patient services, and ultimately, affect patient outcomes. Governing boards are generally comprised of a variety of stakeholders, and may include consumer representatives. Consumers may also be integrated into other governance activities, participate in organization-led projects to develop and disseminate consumer-friendly health and comparative quality information, or in health care system redesign efforts (Mende 2013). Consumer roles may be long-term commitments such as reviewing current services or potential change initiatives, or short-term engagements to provide feedback or preferences on discrete questions (Crawford 2003).

Expected Beneficial Outcomes

Improved quality of care
Increased patient engagement
Increased organizational accountability

Evidence of Effectiveness

Involving consumers in health care governance is a suggested strategy to improve health care quality (Mende 2013), service effectiveness, and organizational accountability, as well as to empower disadvantaged consumers (Crawford 2003). Available evidence suggests that consumer engagement in priority setting may result in different decisions than those that would have been reached without it (Mitton 2009).

A large-scale US-based effort to involve consumers in health care governance indicates that identifying appropriate participants, defining consumer roles, and resistance from some stakeholders can be challenges to successfully engaging and integrating consumers. Requiring consumer involvement, however, appears to help ease barriers to including consumers in governance discussions (Mende 2013).

The experience of the UK’s National Health Service, which has long sought and included some element of consumer involvement, indicates that clearly articulating both what involvement means and what it is intended to achieve is needed in order for consumers to be substantively engaged in decision making (Hogg 2007).

Implementation

United States

Consumer involvement in health care governance is becoming more common among both public and private organizations. Health centers supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) are required to have consumers on their governing boards, as are accountable care organizations (ACOs). The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s (RWJF's) Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative, which ended April 2015, supported efforts to improve quality and value in 16 communities in 14 states, requires local consumer involvement in governance and decision making, program design and implementation, and information dissemination efforts (Mende 2013). 

Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ) was the lead organization for Wisconsin’s AF4Q initiative. WCHQ focuses on public reporting and bringing meaning to performance data (AF4Q-Communities). As part of their AF4Q efforts, WCHQ partnered with Consumer Reports to provide a special regional insert with information on cancer screening tests, care for people age sixty or older, and the treatment of heart disease (Mende 2013).

Implementation Resources

AF4Q-Best practices - Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q). Best practices for engaging consumers in organization leadership: Lessons learned from Aligning Forces for Quality communities. Accessed on March 3, 2016
CC-Consumer input - Community Catalyst (CC). Best practices for meaningful consumer input in new health care delivery models. 2012. Accessed on January 27, 2016

Citations - Description

Crawford 2003 - Crawford M, Rutter D, Thelwall S. User involvement in change management: A review of the literature. National Institute for Health Research, National Health Service (NHS). 2003:1-205. Accessed on January 27, 2016
Mende 2013* - Mende S, Roseman D. The Aligning Forces for Quality experience: Lessons on getting consumers involved in health care improvements. Health Affairs. 2013;32(6):1092-1100. Accessed on January 27, 2016

Citations - Evidence

Crawford 2003 - Crawford M, Rutter D, Thelwall S. User involvement in change management: A review of the literature. National Institute for Health Research, National Health Service (NHS). 2003:1-205. Accessed on January 27, 2016
Hogg 2007* - Hogg CNL. Patient and public involvement: What next for the NHS. Health Expectations. 2007;10:129-38. Accessed on January 27, 2016
Mende 2013* - Mende S, Roseman D. The Aligning Forces for Quality experience: Lessons on getting consumers involved in health care improvements. Health Affairs. 2013;32(6):1092-1100. Accessed on January 27, 2016
Mitton 2009* - Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J. Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009;91:219-28. Accessed on January 27, 2016

Citations - Implementation

AF4Q-Communities - Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q). Improving health & health care in communities across America. Accessed on January 27, 2016
Mende 2013* - Mende S, Roseman D. The Aligning Forces for Quality experience: Lessons on getting consumers involved in health care improvements. Health Affairs. 2013;32(6):1092-1100. Accessed on January 27, 2016

Page Last Updated

May 26, 2015

* Journal subscription may be required for access.