Health Behaviors Tobacco Use Diet & Exercise Alcohol & Drug Use Sexual Activity Search Policies & Programs

hints
Display All Policies & Programs

Family treatment drug courts

Health Factors: Alcohol & Drug Use Community Safety
Decision Makers: Local Government State Government Federal Government
Evidence Rating: Scientifically Supported
Population Reach: <1% of WI's population
Impact on Disparities: No impact on disparities likely

Is this program or policy in use in your community? Tell us about it.

Description

Family treatment drug courts (FTDCs) work with parents involved in the child welfare system who may lose custody of their children due to substance abuse. FTDCs include intensive judicial monitoring, substance abuse treatment, frequent drug testing, comprehensive wrap-around services, and rewards and sanctions linked to program compliance. Eligible families are referred to FTDCs by a parent’s attorney, a social worker, a FTDC administrator, or a family court judge; program participation is voluntary (Green 2007, Gifford 2014). FTDCs address both child safety issues and parental substance abuse treatment (Lloyd 2015).

Expected Beneficial Outcomes

Increased family reunification
Increased substance use disorder treatment
Improved family functioning

Evidence of Effectiveness

There is strong evidence that family treatment drug courts (FTDCs) increase the likelihood that children will safely reunite with their parent(s) and reduce the time children spend in foster care (Lloyd 2015, Marlowe 2012, van Wormer 2016). Parents who participate in FTDCs are more likely to enter and complete substance abuse treatment than parents who receive usual care (Marlowe 2012, van Wormer 2016, Worcel 2008, Bruns 2012).

Parents who participate in FTDCs receive more treatment than parents who receive usual care (Green 2007, Worcel 2008, Chuang 2012, Bruns 2012). FTDCs may also improve family functioning (Rodi 2015, Cosden 2015) and decrease children’s re-entry to foster care (Rodi 2015). Parents who complete FTDC programs are more likely to reunite with their children than parents who do not participate or participate but do not complete the program (Gifford 2014). Enhancing FTDCs with intensive, individualized multi-dimensional family therapy and strategies to increase family engagement and retention, such as peer mentoring and support groups, may further increase the likelihood of reunification (Drabble 2016, Cosden 2015, Child 2015, Oliveros 2011).

In some circumstances, children whose parents are participating in FTDCs are not placed in their permanent homes as quickly as children whose parents are in usual care, perhaps because FTDCs allow parents more time to achieve sobriety than the traditional justice system (Chuang 2012, Worcel 2008). In other circumstances, children whose parents are participating in FTDCs move more quickly toward permanency than children whose parents are not (Bruns 2012, Green 2007).

In a Baltimore-based study, a FTDC yielded $5,500 of savings per family by reducing foster care use and increasing family reunification (Burrus 2011).

Implementation

United States

In 2015, there are more than 300 family treatment drug courts operating in the United States (OJJDP-FDC guidelines).

Wisconsin

The Wisconsin Association of Treatment Court Professionals provides training, resources, and standards for staff in adult, juvenile, and family treatment courts (WATCP). The Milwaukee Family Drug Treatment Court has been in operation since 2011 (Milwaukee-FDTC).

Implementation Resources

NCSACW-FTDCs - National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare (NCSACW). Family treatment drug courts (FTDCs). Accessed on October 12, 2016

Citations - Description

Gifford 2014 - Gifford EJ, Eldred LM, Vernerey A, Sloan FA. How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes? Child Abuse & Neglect. 2014;38(10):1659-1670. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Green 2007* - Green BL, Furrer C, Worcel S, Burrus S, Finigan MW. How effective are family treatment drug courts? Outcomes from a four-site national study. Child Maltreatment. 2007;12(1):43-59. Accessed on October 11, 2016
Lloyd 2015* - Lloyd MH. Family drug courts: Conceptual frameworks, empirical evidence, and implications for social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 2015;96(1):49-57. Accessed on October 19, 2016

Citations - Evidence

Bruns 2012* - Bruns EJ, Pullman MD, Weathers ES, Wirschem ML, Murphy JK. Effects of a multidisciplinary family treatment drug court on child and family outcomes: Results of a quasi-experimental study. Child Maltreatment. 2012;17(3):218-30. Accessed on October 20, 2016
Burrus 2011 - Burrus SWM, Mackin JR, Finigan MW. Show me the money: Child welfare cost savings of a family drug court. Juvenile and Family Court Journal. 2011;62(3):1-14. Accessed on October 11, 2016
Child 2015* - Child H, McIntyre D. Examining the relationships between family drug court program compliance and child welfare outcomes. Child Welfare. 2015;94(5):67-87. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Chuang 2012* - Chuang E, Moore K, Barrett B, Young MS. Effect of an integrated family dependency treatment court on child welfare reunification, time to permanency and re-entry rates. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34(9):1896-1902. Accessed on October 11, 2016
Cosden 2015* - Cosden M, Koch LM. Changes in adult, child, and family functioning among participants in a family treatment drug court. Child Welfare. 2015;94(5):89-106. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Drabble 2016 - Drabble LA, Haun LL, Kushins H, Cohen E. Measuring client satisfaction and engagement: The role of a mentor parent program in family drug treatment court. Juvenile & Family Court Journal. 2016;67(1):19-32. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Gifford 2014 - Gifford EJ, Eldred LM, Vernerey A, Sloan FA. How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes? Child Abuse & Neglect. 2014;38(10):1659-1670. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Green 2007* - Green BL, Furrer C, Worcel S, Burrus S, Finigan MW. How effective are family treatment drug courts? Outcomes from a four-site national study. Child Maltreatment. 2007;12(1):43-59. Accessed on October 11, 2016
Lloyd 2015* - Lloyd MH. Family drug courts: Conceptual frameworks, empirical evidence, and implications for social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 2015;96(1):49-57. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Marlowe 2012 - Marlowe DB, Carey SM. Research update on Family Drug Courts. Need to Know. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP); 2012. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Oliveros 2011* - Oliveros A, Kaufman J. Addressing substance abuse treatment needs of parents involved with the child welfare system. Child Welfare. 2011;90(1):25–41. Accessed on October 11, 2016
Rodi 2015* - Rodi MS, Killian CM, Breitenbucher P, et al. New approaches for working with children and families involved in family treatment drug courts: Findings from the Children Affected by Methamphetamine Program. Child Welfare. 2015;94(4):205-232. Accessed on October 19, 2016
van Wormer 2016* - van Wormer J, Hsieh ML. Healing families: Outcomes from a family treatment drug court. Juvenile & Family Court Journal. 2016;67(2):49-65. Accessed on October 19, 2016
Worcel 2008* - Worcel SD, Furrer CJ, Green BL, Burrus SWM, Finigan MW. Effects of family treatment drug courts on substance abuse and child welfare outcomes. Child Abuse Review. 2008;17(6):427-43. Accessed on October 11, 2016

Citations - Implementation

Milwaukee-FDTC - Milwaukee County. Family Drug Treatment Court (FDTC). Accessed on October 19, 2016
OJJDP-FDC guidelines - Children and Families Futures. Guidance to States: Recommendations for developing family drug court (FDC) guidelines. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Office of Justice Programs; 2015. Accessed on October 20, 2016
WATCP - Wisconsin Association of Treatment Court Professionals (WATCP). Promoting treatment courts. Accessed on October 19, 2016

Page Last Updated

October 14, 2016

* Journal subscription may be required for access.