Social & Economic Factors Education Employment Income Family & Social Support Community Safety Search Policies & Programs

hints
Display All Policies & Programs

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for offenders

Health Factors: Community Safety
Decision Makers: Local Government State Government Federal Government
Evidence Rating: Scientifically Supported
Population Reach: 1-9% of WI's population
Impact on Disparities: No impact on disparities likely

Is this program or policy in use in your community? Tell us about it.

Description

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) helps clients discover and change the thought processes that lead to maladaptive behavior (Wilson 2005). CBT programs for offenders emphasize personal accountability, help offenders understand the thoughts and choices that led to their crimes, and teach alternative behaviors and thought processes. Programs are delivered in correctional facilities for inmates or in community settings for probationers under supervision, as individual or group therapy (Campbell-Lipsey 2007). Offenders are often referred to CBT programs through the justice system; some offenders choose to participate voluntarily.

Expected Beneficial Outcomes

Reduced crime
Reduced recidivism

Evidence of Effectiveness

There is strong evidence that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) reduces recidivism among youth (Campbell-Lipsey 2007, Wilson 2005, Jeong 2017, Jewell 2015) and adult offenders (Campbell-Lipsey 2007, Wilson 2005, Ferguson 2013, Barnes 2017, Usher 2014, Feucht 2016). CBT also reduces recidivism among sex offenders (Campbell-Schmucker 2017, Grady 2017). Effects are strongest for offenders with a high risk of recidivism (Campbell-Lipsey 2007).

CBT can also reduce recidivism among those with substance-related offenses (McMurran 2007, Quinn 2015, Needham 2015). For violent and chronic juvenile male offenders, CBT is particularly effective in reducing the recurrence of serious crimes (Campbell-Garrido 2007). An evaluation of a CBT program designed for female offenders suggests CBT can reduce rearrests and reconviction among female offenders when implemented with high fidelity (Duwe 2015). Analysis of Canada-based CBT programs indicates that CBT is effective for offenders with various ethnic backgrounds (Usher 2014).

The most effective CBT programs usually include anger management and interpersonal skills training. Training providers in CBT, closely monitoring programs, and ensuring program fidelity also result in better outcomes (Campbell-Lipsey 2007). CBT for juvenile offenders appears to reduce recidivism more when it includes group parenting education, particularly when parents complete the education (Jeong 2017).

An Iowa-based cost-benefit analysis estimates a $35 return for every dollar invested in CBT programs (Pew-Results first 2013). 

Implementation

United States

There are some cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs widely used in the US criminal justice system, such as Aggression Replacement Training (EPISCenter-ART), Criminal Conduct and Substance Abuse Treatment-Strategies for Self-Improvement and Change (SSC), Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT), Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R), and Thinking for a Change (NIC-T4C) (US DOJ-CBT).

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Department of Corrections (WIDOC) provides cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs through the Becky Young Community Corrections Recidivism Reduction Appropriation. Approximately $1,087,000 was allocated for these programs during fiscal year 2017. WIDOC, in partnership with the University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute, implements and monitors Thinking for a Change and other cognitive-behavioral interventions for substance abuse and domestic violence offenders, and provides CBT training materials to staff in the criminal and juvenile justice system. WIDOC also collaborates with counties providing CBT programs, supporting efforts such as the Bayfield County Jail Project (WI DOC-Becky Young 2017).

Implementation Resources

NIC-CBT - National Institute of Corrections (NIC). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). US Department of Justice. Accessed on April 4, 2018

Citations - Description

Campbell-Lipsey 2007 - Lipsey MW, Landenberger NA, Wilson SJ. Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2007:6. Accessed on April 5, 2018
Wilson 2005* - Wilson DB, Bouffard LA, Mackenzie DL. A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2005;32(2):172–204. Accessed on April 5, 2018

Citations - Evidence

Barnes 2017* - Barnes GC, Hyatt JM, Sherman LW. Even a little bit helps: An implementation and experimental evaluation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for high-risk probationers. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2017;44(4):611-630. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Campbell-Garrido 2007 - Garrido V, Morales LA. Serious (violent or chronic) juvenile offenders: A systematic review of treatment effectiveness in secure corrections. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2007:7. Accessed on April 5, 2018
Campbell-Lipsey 2007 - Lipsey MW, Landenberger NA, Wilson SJ. Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2007:6. Accessed on April 5, 2018
Campbell-Schmucker 2017 - Schmucker M, Lösel F. Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2017:8. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Duwe 2015* - Duwe G, Clark V. Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy. 2015;14(2):301-328. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Ferguson 2013 - Ferguson LM, Wormith JS. A meta-analysis of moral reconation therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2013;57(9):1076-1106. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Feucht 2016 - Feucht T, Holt T. Does cognitive behavioral therapy work in criminal justice? A new analysis from CrimeSolutions.gov. NIJ Journal. 2016;(277):10-17. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Grady 2017* - Grady MD, Edwards D, Pettus-Davis C. A longitudinal outcome evaluation of a prison-based sex offender treatment program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2017;29(3):239-266. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Jeong 2017* - Jeong S, Fenoff R, Martin JH. Evaluating the effectiveness of an evidence-based cognitive restructuring approach: 1-year results from Project ASPECT. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2017;10(1):1-16. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Jewell 2015* - Jewell JD, Malone MD, Rose P, Sturgeon D, Owens S. A multiyear follow-up study examining the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral group therapy program on the recidivism of juveniles on probation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2015;59(3):259-272. Accessed on April 2, 2018
McMurran 2007* - McMurran M. What works in substance misuse treatments for offenders? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 2007;17(4):225–33. Accessed on April 5, 2018
Needham 2015* - Needham M, Gummerum M, Mandeville-Norden R, et al. Association between three different cognitive behavioral alcohol treatment programs and recidivism rates among male offenders: Findings from the United Kingdom. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2015;39(6):1100-1107. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Pew-Results first 2013 - The Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew). The Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative in Iowa (Results first). 2013. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Quinn 2015* - Quinn TP, Quinn EL. The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on driving while intoxicated recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues. 2015;45(4):431-446. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Usher 2014* - Usher AM, Stewart LA. Effectiveness of correctional programs with ethnically diverse offenders: A meta-analytic study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2014;58(2):209-230. Accessed on April 2, 2018
Wilson 2005* - Wilson DB, Bouffard LA, Mackenzie DL. A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2005;32(2):172–204. Accessed on April 5, 2018

Citations - Implementation

EPISCenter-ART - Evidence-based Prevention & Intervention Support Center (EPISCenter). Aggression Replacement Training (ART). Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, Penn State University Prevention Research Center. Accessed on April 4, 2018
MRT - Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT). MRT changes minds. Accessed on April 4, 2018
NIC-T4C - National Institute of Corrections (NIC). Thinking for a Change (T4C). US Department of Justice. Accessed on April 4, 2018
R&R - Ross RR, Fabiano E, Ross RD. The reasoning & rehabilitation (R&R) program. Ottawa, CAN: Cognitive Centre of Canada. Accessed on April 5, 2018
US DOJ-CBT - Thigpen ML, Keiser GM. Cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT): A review and discussion for corrections professionals. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice (US DOJ), National Institute of Corrections (NIC); 2007. Accessed on April 5, 2018
WI DOC-Becky Young 2017 - Wisconsin Department of Corrections (WI DOC). Becky Young Community Corrections Recidivism Reduction fiscal year 2017 report (Becky Young). September 2017. Accessed on April 4, 2018

Page Last Updated

March 28, 2018

* Journal subscription may be required for access.