Social & Economic Factors Education Employment Income Family & Social Support Community Safety Search Policies & Programs

Display All Policies & Programs Contribute Content

School-based programs to reduce/prevent violent & aggressive behavior

Health Factors: Education
Decision Makers: Community Organizations, Government - Local, Government - State, Schools
Evidence Rating: Scientifically Supported
Population Reach: 10-19% of WI's population
Impact on Disparities: Likely to decrease disparities

Is this program or policy in use in your community? Tell us about it.

Description

School-based violence prevention programs such as Too Good for Violence (TGFV) and Responding In Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) help students learn the skills they need to get along with their classmates and peers. TGFV's trained teachers, counselors, and prevention specialists teach students positive attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, building skills sequentially as the student progresses from one grade to another. These programs' interactive teaching methods encourage students to bond with prosocial peers and engage students through role-playing, cooperative learning, games, small-group activities, and class discussions.

Expected Beneficial Outcomes

Decreased violent behavior
Decreased aggression and aggressive behavior
Increased communication skills
Increased good behavior

Evidence of Effectiveness

School-based secondary prevention programs to reduce aggressive behavior have been shown to produce improvements in behavior. FYI gives Too Good for Violence (TGFV) a level 1 rating, their highest, stating that studies have shown positive effects related to student violence and alcohol, tobacco, and drug use. Teachers observed significantly more frequent use of prosocial personal and social skills and behaviors. Cochrane-Mytton 2006 concludes that such school-based secondary prevention programs appear to produce improvements in behavior, greater than would have been expected by chance. Healthevidence.ca rates this review as level 9 (of 10). According to Find Youth Info, Responding In Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) is designed to teach middle/ junior high schools students to learn conflict resolution strategies and skills, including peer mediation. Compared with students who did not participate in RIPP, participants were reported to have fewer disciplinary violations for violent offenses, fewer in-school suspensions, increased use of peer mediation programs, fewer fight-related injuries, and greater knowledge of effective problem-solving skills.

Citations - Evidence

Cochrane-Mytton 2006* - Mytton J, DiGuiseppi C, Gough D, Taylor R, Logan S. School-based secondary prevention programmes for preventing violence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;(3):CD004606. Accessed on June 19, 2012
Webpage: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD004606/frame.html
FYI - Find Youth Info (FYI). Program directory of evidence-based, federally-funded youth programs. Accessed on May 1, 2012
Webpage: http://www.findyouthinfo.gov/programsearch.aspx

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

Comments from Users about this Policy/Program (Cost, Feasibility, Lessons Learned)

No comments

 

Health Factors

Health Behaviors
Tobacco Use
Diet & Exercise
Alcohol Use
Sexual Activity
Clinical Care
Access to Care
Quality of Care
Social & Economic Factors
Education
Employment
Income
Family & Social Support
Community Safety
Physical Environment
Environmental Quality
Built Environment

Decision Makers

Businesses & Employers
Community Organizations
Government - Local
Government - State
Government - Federal
Healthcare Organizations
Individuals
Schools

Evidence Rating

Level of effectiveness based on a scan of academic literature and key recommendations of leading organizations.

  • Scientifically Supported Numerous studies or systematic review(s) with positive results
  • Some Evidence Research suggests positive impacts; further study may be warranted
  • Expert Opinion Recommended by credible groups*; research evidence limited
  • Insufficient Evidence Evidence limited or unavailable; further study warranted
  • Mixed Evidence Evidence mixed; further study warranted
  • Evidence of Ineffectiveness Research consistently shows program is detrimental or has no effect

Although many policies and programs are recommended by credible groups, we apply the rating ‘expert opinion’ only when policies are recommended but limited scientific evidence of effectiveness is available.

* The American Heritage Dictionary defines credible as 'capable of being believed; plausible.' and 'worthy of confidence; reliable.' To be considered an 'expert recommendation,' policies and programs must be recommended by one or more organizations that are recognized for their impartial expertise in the area of interest and have limited evidence available.

Potential Population Reach

Portion of Wisconsin's population likely to be reached by a policy or program if implemented statewide, based on its characteristics (e.g., target population(s), geographic limitations, and potential implementers).

<1%   20-49%
1-9%   50-99%
10-19%   100%

Potential Population Reach

Portion of Wisconsin's population likely to be reached by a policy or program if implemented statewide, based on its characteristics (e.g., target population(s), geographic limitations, and potential implementers).

<1%   20-49%
1-9%   50-99%
10-19%   100%

Potential Impact on Health Disparities

Likely impact of a given policy or program on racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, geographic or other disparities in Wisconsin based on its characteristics (e.g., target audience, mode of delivery, etc.) and best available evidence related to disparities.

  • Likely to decrease disparities
  • No impact on disparities likely
  • Likely to increase disparities