| Health Factors: | Income |
|---|---|
| Decision Makers: | ![]() Government - State, Government - Federal |
| Evidence Rating: | |
| Population Reach: | 1-9% of WI's population |
| Impact on Disparities: |
Is this program or policy in use in your community? Tell us about it.
The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program provides cash to meet basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter for aged, blind or disabled people with little or no income. Benefits issued by the federal government can be supplemented with additional state contributions (SSA).
Increased income
Social insurance programs such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are widely used by governments to increase the income of those unable to work, such as the elderly and individuals with disabilities severe enough to prevent gainful employment. Available evidence suggests that SSI receipt can increase total household income and reduce the likelihood of child poverty (Duggan 2007a). Loss of SSI benefits has been shown to increase the likelihood of hardships such as hunger, homelessness (Norris 2003), and unmet medical needs (Hemmeter 2011). Additional evidence is needed to confirm optimal program targeting and benefit amounts.
Application for SSI disability benefits is a function of health but is also influenced by program rules and benefits. Six states do not pay SSI supplements: Arizona, Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota, Tennessee, and West Virginia. The federal SSA implements SSI supplements for fourteen states; other states implement their own (SSA-State assistance 2011).
Wisconsin provides an SSI supplement for those who qualify for the federal program (WI DHS-SSI).
* Journal subscription may be required for access.
No comments
|
Health Behaviors |
Clinical Care |
Social & Economic Factors |
Physical Environment |
Level of effectiveness based on a scan of academic literature and key recommendations of leading organizations.
Although many policies and programs are recommended by credible groups, we apply the rating ‘expert opinion’ only when policies are recommended but limited scientific evidence of effectiveness is available.
* The American Heritage Dictionary defines credible as 'capable of being believed; plausible.' and 'worthy of confidence; reliable.' To be considered an 'expert recommendation,' policies and programs must be recommended by one or more organizations that are recognized for their impartial expertise in the area of interest and have limited evidence available.
Portion of Wisconsin's population likely to be reached by a policy or program if implemented statewide, based on its characteristics (e.g., target population(s), geographic limitations, and potential implementers).
![]() |
<1% | ![]() |
20-49% | |
![]() |
1-9% | ![]() |
50-99% | |
![]() |
10-19% | ![]() |
100% |
Portion of Wisconsin's population likely to be reached by a policy or program if implemented statewide, based on its characteristics (e.g., target population(s), geographic limitations, and potential implementers).
![]() |
<1% | ![]() |
20-49% | |
![]() |
1-9% | ![]() |
50-99% | |
![]() |
10-19% | ![]() |
100% |
Likely impact of a given policy or program on racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, geographic or other disparities in Wisconsin based on its characteristics (e.g., target audience, mode of delivery, etc.) and best available evidence related to disparities.