About This Database
This database, Policies and Programs to Improve Wisconsin's Health, is a summary of a wide scan of
research to find evidence of effectiveness for policies
and programs that address the multiple drivers of health that, in turn, affect our health outcomes. The database
currently includes more than 360 policies and programs.
Policies and programs are listed within the three major categories of drivers of health.
The database includes a variety of categories of information about each program and policy as well as
ratings of selected characteristics of the programs:
Categories of Information:
- A brief description of the policy or program
- The decision maker(s) who could enact the policy or program
- The level of implementation in other states and in Wisconsin
- The expected beneficial outcomes of the policy or program
- Sources of evidence on the effectiveness of the policy or program
Rating Measures:
- Strength of evidence of policy/program effectiveness
- Potential impact of the policy or program on health disparities
- Potential population reach, i.e., the number of Wisconsin residents potentially affected
Ideas? Suggestions?
Know of a policy or program not in our database?
Suggest a Policy or Program
Have more information about a specific policy or program in our database? Want to provide input about
feasibility, costs, or unintended consequences of a policy or program?
Use the Submit a Comment feature
next to the policy/program.
How to Use This Database
You can browse the entire listing of policies and programs or you can search the database for specific
policies or programs.
If you choose to search the database, there are two main ways to search:
- By typing in a key word or phrase, e.g., mental health
- Using the Advanced Search option to search by one or more of the following classifications:
- Decision Maker (e.g., community organization),
- Topic (e.g., physical activity),
- Strength of Evidence,
- Potential Population Reach,
- Disparity Impact,
- Policy or Program, and/or
- Implementation Status
Evidence of effectiveness
"Effectiveness" means whether a policy or programs works in real life while the American Heritage Dictionary defines "evidence"
as "the data on which a judgment can be based or proof established." However, there can a range of different types of evidence,
from "data resulting from scientific controlled trials and research" through "expert or user consensus, evaluation, or anecdotal
information" or personal observation.
Our review focused on scientific evidence (the accumulation of data through evaluation and research that carefully examines how an
intervention is delivered and what improvements result). We searched for the best available research results and for data-driven
reviews, rather than intuitive judgment, expertise or experience.
Our gold standard for "evidence of effectiveness" was based on comprehensive systematic reviews that found strong evidence of
effectiveness of a particular program or policy. (Systematic reviews involve using a set of specific criteria to perform critical
assessment and evaluation of all research studies that address a particular issue.)
In the absence of availability of systematic reviews in particular areas, we conducted direct searches for research evaluating the
effectiveness of particular policies or programs. The best direct evidence comes from the gold standard of research designs:
randomized control trials (RCTs). However, in many areas, it is not feasible, practical or ethical to evaluate programs and
policies using RCTs. In these cases, we looked for good evidence based on other attributes such as relevance, objectivity, and
credibility.
|